Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs MRLTX
CGFAX vs MRLTX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs MRLTX
CGFAX vs MRLTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. MRLTX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and MRLTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MRLTX (131M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than MRLTX: CGFAX (0.23) vs MRLTX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than MRLTX: CGFAX (24 years) vs MRLTX (17 years). MRLTX (1.11) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). MRLTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MRLTX: CGFAX (250) vs MRLTX (2000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.47 vs. MRLTX (-3.72). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.54 vs. MRLTX (1.97).
| CGFAX | MRLTX | CGFAX / MRLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.00 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.11 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.338 | 3.109 | 204% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 131M | 275,573% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.47 | -3.72 | -227% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.92 | 10.77 | 417% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.54 | 1.97 | 788% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.73 | 68.06 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement