Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs MRLTX
CGFAX vs MRLTX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs MRLTX
CGFAX vs MRLTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. MRLTX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and MRLTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MRLTX (118M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than MRLTX: CGFAX (0.23) vs MRLTX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than MRLTX: CGFAX (25 years) vs MRLTX (17 years). MRLTX (1.11) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). MRLTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MRLTX: CGFAX (250) vs MRLTX (2000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.21 vs. MRLTX (-13.18). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.79 vs. MRLTX (-4.40).
| CGFAX | MRLTX | CGFAX / MRLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.00 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.11 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.810 | 1.994 | 442% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 118M | 299,153% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.21 | -13.18 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.98 | 7.14 | 616% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.79 | -4.40 | -291% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.62 | 58.53 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement