Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs NLCCX
CGFAX vs NLCCX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs NLCCX
CGFAX vs NLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. NLCCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and NLCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. NLCCX (801M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: CGFAX (0.23) vs NLCCX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than NLCCX: CGFAX (24 years) vs NLCCX (29 years). NLCCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: CGFAX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.80 vs. NLCCX (0.06). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.03 vs. NLCCX (-20.70).
| CGFAX | NLCCX | CGFAX / NLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.64 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.64 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.432 | 10.636 | 98% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 801M | 42,197% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.80 | 0.06 | 23,546% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.03 | 40.41 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.03 | -20.70 | -121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.58 | 16.94 | 694% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers