Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs NLCCX
CGFAX vs NLCCX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs NLCCX
CGFAX vs NLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. NLCCX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and NLCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. NLCCX (749M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: CGFAX (0.23) vs NLCCX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than NLCCX: CGFAX (24 years) vs NLCCX (29 years). NLCCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: CGFAX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.21 vs. NLCCX (-12.58). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.51 vs. NLCCX (-33.88).
| CGFAX | NLCCX | CGFAX / NLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.64 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.64 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.665 | 3.858 | 121% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 749M | 47,664% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.21 | -12.58 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.97 | 25.18 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.51 | -33.88 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.71 | 7.02 | 1,463% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement