Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs NVLIX
CGFAX vs NVLIX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs NVLIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$84.71
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG I
Price$67.22
Change+$0.49 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets846.49M
CGFAX vs NVLIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. NVLIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and NVLIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. NVLIX (846M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than NVLIX: CGFAX (0.30) vs NVLIX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than NVLIX: CGFAX (24 years) vs NVLIX (17 years). NVLIX (0.83) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). NVLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NVLIX: CGFAX (250) vs NVLIX (100000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.84 vs. NVLIX (-3.22). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.52 vs. NVLIX (25.81).
| CGFAX | NVLIX | CGFAX / NVLIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.65 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.83 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.787 | 10.206 | 155% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 846M | 38,652% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.84 | -3.22 | -213% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.98 | 50.12 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.52 | 25.81 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.75 | 40.81 | 232% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement