Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs NVLIX
CGFAX vs NVLIX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs NVLIX
CGFAX vs NVLIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. NVLIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and NVLIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. NVLIX (1.01B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than NVLIX: CGFAX (0.23) vs NVLIX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than NVLIX: CGFAX (24 years) vs NVLIX (17 years). NVLIX (0.78) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). NVLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NVLIX: CGFAX (250) vs NVLIX (100000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. NVLIX (-2.69). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.99 vs. NVLIX (0.74).
| CGFAX | NVLIX | CGFAX / NVLIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.65 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.78 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.708 | 7.862 | 111% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 1.01B | 35,637% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | -2.69 | -445% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.15 | 25.14 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.99 | 0.74 | 2,574% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.58 | 58.96 | 208% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement