Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs NWCAX
CGFAX vs NWCAX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs NWCAX
CGFAX vs NWCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. NWCAX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and NWCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. NWCAX (1B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: CGFAX (0.23) vs NWCAX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than NWCAX: CGFAX (24 years) vs NWCAX (17 years). NWCAX (1.03) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). NWCAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: CGFAX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.21 vs. NWCAX (-6.72). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.54 vs. NWCAX (-4.26).
| CGFAX | NWCAX | CGFAX / NWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.90 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.03 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.365 | 6.303 | 117% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 1B | 36,100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.21 | -6.72 | -152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.49 | 17.19 | 259% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.54 | -4.26 | -458% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.79 | 41.62 | 278% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers