Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs OWACX
CGFAX vs OWACX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs OWACX
CGFAX vs OWACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. OWACX commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and OWACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. OWACX (3.5B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than OWACX: CGFAX (0.23) vs OWACX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than OWACX: CGFAX (24 years) vs OWACX (28 years). OWACX (0.95) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). OWACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than OWACX: CGFAX (250) vs OWACX (1000). OWACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.14 vs. CGFAX (6.86). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.63 vs. OWACX (11.58).
| CGFAX | OWACX | CGFAX / OWACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.95 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.95 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.591 | 0.000 | - |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 3.5B | 10,326% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.86 | 8.14 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.26 | 23.64 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.63 | 11.58 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.25 | 119.80 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement