Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs PAWAX
CGFAX vs PAWAX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs PAWAX
CGFAX vs PAWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. PAWAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and PAWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. PAWAX (14.4B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than PAWAX: CGFAX (0.23) vs PAWAX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than PAWAX: CGFAX (24 years) vs PAWAX (21 years). PAWAX (1.05) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). PAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.80 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAWAX: CGFAX (250) vs PAWAX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.20 vs. PAWAX (1.31). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.81 vs. PAWAX (-1.81).
| CGFAX | PAWAX | CGFAX / PAWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.05 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.05 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.149 | 1.121 | 637% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 14.4B | 2,479% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.20 | 1.31 | 320% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.95 | 25.90 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.81 | -1.81 | -871% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.94 | 85.86 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement