Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs PBCKX
CGFAX vs PBCKX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs PBCKX
CGFAX vs PBCKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. PBCKX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and PBCKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. PBCKX (7.9B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than PBCKX: CGFAX (0.23) vs PBCKX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than PBCKX: CGFAX (24 years) vs PBCKX (14 years). PBCKX (0.69) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PBCKX (20.90). PBCKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: PBCKX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.00 vs. PBCKX (-18.08). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.80 vs. PBCKX (0.83).
| CGFAX | PBCKX | CGFAX / PBCKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.66 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.69 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.300 | -4.672 | -135% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 7.9B | 4,571% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.00 | -18.08 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.24 | 20.24 | 224% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.80 | 0.83 | 2,133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.35 | 151.72 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement