Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs PBLAX
CGFAX vs PBLAX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs PBLAX
CGFAX vs PBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. PBLAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and PBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. PBLAX (7.79B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than PBLAX: CGFAX (0.23) vs PBLAX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than PBLAX: CGFAX (24 years) vs PBLAX (13 years). PBLAX (0.95) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PBLAX (20.90). PBLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBLAX: CGFAX (250) vs PBLAX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. PBLAX (-15.81). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.99 vs. PBLAX (-2.40).
| CGFAX | PBLAX | CGFAX / PBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.92 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.95 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.708 | -3.153 | -276% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 7.79B | 4,632% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | -15.81 | -76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.15 | 18.93 | 254% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.99 | -2.40 | -792% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.58 | 150.58 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement