Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs PBQAX
CGFAX vs PBQAX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs PBQAX
CGFAX vs PBQAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. PBQAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a StrongBuy and PBQAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. PBQAX (1.17B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than PBQAX: CGFAX (0.24) vs PBQAX (0.04). CGFAX was incepted earlier than PBQAX: CGFAX (25 years) vs PBQAX (37 years). PBQAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). PBQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). PBQAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBQAX: CGFAX (250) vs PBQAX (1000). PBQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.67 vs. CGFAX (5.42). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.11 vs. PBQAX (3.01).
| CGFAX | PBQAX | CGFAX / PBQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.91 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.91 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.418 | 14.494 | 65% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 1.17B | 29,131% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.04 | 669% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 12.67 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.86 | 37.88 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.11 | 3.01 | 568% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.74 | 49.48 | 214% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers