Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs PBQAX
CGFAX vs PBQAX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs PBQAX
CGFAX vs PBQAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. PBQAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and PBQAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. PBQAX (1.18B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than PBQAX: CGFAX (0.23) vs PBQAX (0.04). CGFAX was incepted earlier than PBQAX: CGFAX (24 years) vs PBQAX (36 years). PBQAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). PBQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). PBQAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBQAX: CGFAX (250) vs PBQAX (1000). PBQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.94 vs. CGFAX (4.20). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.81 vs. PBQAX (3.55).
| CGFAX | PBQAX | CGFAX / PBQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.91 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.91 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.149 | 13.806 | 52% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 1.18B | 30,280% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.04 | 663% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.20 | 12.94 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.95 | 32.57 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.81 | 3.55 | 445% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.94 | 52.28 | 205% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers