Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs PBQAX
CGFAX vs PBQAX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs PBQAX
CGFAX vs PBQAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. PBQAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and PBQAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. PBQAX (1.18B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than PBQAX: CGFAX (0.23) vs PBQAX (0.04). CGFAX was incepted earlier than PBQAX: CGFAX (24 years) vs PBQAX (36 years). PBQAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). PBQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). PBQAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBQAX: CGFAX (250) vs PBQAX (1000). PBQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.25 vs. CGFAX (11.97). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.99 vs. PBQAX (3.68).
| CGFAX | PBQAX | CGFAX / PBQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.91 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.91 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.708 | 13.077 | 67% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 1.18B | 30,671% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.04 | 645% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | 17.25 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.15 | 37.84 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.99 | 3.68 | 516% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.58 | 60.85 | 201% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement