Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs PEQZX
CGFAX vs PEQZX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs PEQZX
CGFAX vs PEQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. PEQZX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and PEQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. PEQZX (1.18B). PEQZX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: PEQZX (0.26) vs CGFAX (0.23). CGFAX was incepted earlier than PEQZX: CGFAX (24 years) vs PEQZX (30 years). PEQZX (0.64) and CGFAX (0.62) have similar cost to investors . PEQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). PEQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: PEQZX (0) vs CGFAX (250). PEQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.62 vs. CGFAX (11.97). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.99 vs. PEQZX (5.01).
| CGFAX | PEQZX | CGFAX / PEQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.64 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.64 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.708 | 13.189 | 66% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 1.18B | 30,671% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.26 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | 17.62 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.15 | 39.18 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.99 | 5.01 | 379% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.58 | 64.58 | 190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement