Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs PGBGX
CGFAX vs PGBGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs PGBGX
CGFAX vs PGBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. PGBGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and PGBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. PGBGX (8.52B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than PGBGX: CGFAX (0.23) vs PGBGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than PGBGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs PGBGX (10 years). PGBGX (0.85) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PGBGX (20.90). PGBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: PGBGX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.80 vs. PGBGX (-11.64). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.03 vs. PGBGX (9.66).
| CGFAX | PGBGX | CGFAX / PGBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.82 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.85 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.432 | 1.635 | 638% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 8.52B | 3,966% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.80 | -11.64 | -127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.03 | 28.42 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.03 | 9.66 | 259% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.58 | 157.77 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement