Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs PLAAX
CGFAX vs PLAAX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs PLAAX
CGFAX vs PLAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. PLAAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and PLAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. PLAAX (708M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than PLAAX: CGFAX (0.23) vs PLAAX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than PLAAX: CGFAX (24 years) vs PLAAX (26 years). PLAAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). PLAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). PLAAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PLAAX: CGFAX (250) vs PLAAX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. PLAAX (-9.59). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.99 vs. PLAAX (-50.11).
| CGFAX | PLAAX | CGFAX / PLAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.13 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.14 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.708 | 3.279 | 266% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 708M | 50,989% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | -9.59 | -125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.15 | 10.44 | 461% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.99 | -50.11 | -38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.58 | -32.99 | -372% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement