Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs PLAAX
CGFAX vs PLAAX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs PLAAX
CGFAX vs PLAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. PLAAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and PLAAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. PLAAX (697M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than PLAAX: CGFAX (0.23) vs PLAAX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than PLAAX: CGFAX (24 years) vs PLAAX (26 years). PLAAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). PLAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). PLAAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PLAAX: CGFAX (250) vs PLAAX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.20 vs. PLAAX (-13.93). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.81 vs. PLAAX (-52.09).
| CGFAX | PLAAX | CGFAX / PLAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.13 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.14 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.149 | 2.235 | 320% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 697M | 51,220% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.20 | -13.93 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.95 | 4.97 | 783% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.81 | -52.09 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.94 | -37.27 | -287% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement