Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs PLAAX
CGFAX vs PLAAX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs PLAAX
CGFAX vs PLAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. PLAAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a StrongBuy and PLAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. PLAAX (669M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than PLAAX: CGFAX (0.24) vs PLAAX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than PLAAX: CGFAX (25 years) vs PLAAX (26 years). PLAAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). PLAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). PLAAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PLAAX: CGFAX (250) vs PLAAX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.42 vs. PLAAX (-17.17). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.11 vs. PLAAX (-53.89).
| CGFAX | PLAAX | CGFAX / PLAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.13 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.14 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.418 | -0.075 | -12,639% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 669M | 51,121% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | -17.17 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.86 | 6.09 | 769% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.11 | -53.89 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.74 | -40.32 | -262% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement