Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs RAFBX
CGFAX vs RAFBX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs RAFBX
CGFAX vs RAFBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. RAFBX commentary
Sep 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a StrongBuy and RAFBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. RAFBX (93.1B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than RAFBX: CGFAX (0.23) vs RAFBX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than RAFBX: CGFAX (25 years) vs RAFBX (24 years). RAFBX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). RAFBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX (250) and RAFBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.05 vs. RAFBX (-6.03). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.34 vs. RAFBX (-8.98).
| CGFAX | RAFBX | CGFAX / RAFBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.43 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.43 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.862 | -3.830 | -258% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 93.1B | 367% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | -6.03 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.94 | 16.76 | 262% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.34 | -8.98 | -148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.92 | 46.15 | 243% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement