Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs RAFBX
CGFAX vs RAFBX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs RAFBX
CGFAX vs RAFBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. RAFBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and RAFBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. RAFBX (94.9B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than RAFBX: CGFAX (0.23) vs RAFBX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than RAFBX: CGFAX (24 years) vs RAFBX (24 years). RAFBX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). RAFBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX (250) and RAFBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.20 vs. RAFBX (-2.83). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.81 vs. RAFBX (-5.62).
| CGFAX | RAFBX | CGFAX / RAFBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.43 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.43 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.149 | -4.450 | -161% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 94.9B | 376% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.20 | -2.83 | -149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.95 | 14.18 | 275% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.81 | -5.62 | -281% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.94 | 44.26 | 242% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers