Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs RAFBX
CGFAX vs RAFBX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs RAFBX
CGFAX vs RAFBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. RAFBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and RAFBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. RAFBX (93.8B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than RAFBX: CGFAX (0.23) vs RAFBX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than RAFBX: CGFAX (24 years) vs RAFBX (24 years). RAFBX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). RAFBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX (250) and RAFBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.80 vs. RAFBX (10.09). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.03 vs. RAFBX (5.71).
| CGFAX | RAFBX | CGFAX / RAFBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.43 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.43 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.432 | 6.823 | 153% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 93.8B | 360% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.80 | 10.09 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.03 | 34.64 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.03 | 5.71 | 438% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.58 | 59.65 | 197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement