Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs RAFGX
CGFAX vs RAFGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs RAFGX
CGFAX vs RAFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. RAFGX commentary
Jul 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and RAFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. RAFGX (94.9B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than RAFGX: CGFAX (0.23) vs RAFGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than RAFGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs RAFGX (17 years). CGFAX (0.62) is less costly to investors than RAFGX (0.33). RAFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX (250) and RAFGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.54 vs. RAFGX (-0.65). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.02 vs. RAFGX (6.98).
| CGFAX | RAFGX | CGFAX / RAFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.33 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.33 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.349 | -3.311 | -162% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 94.9B | 376% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.54 | -0.65 | -237% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.02 | 23.73 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.02 | 6.98 | 201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.12 | 73.56 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers