Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs RAFGX
CGFAX vs RAFGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs RAFGX
CGFAX vs RAFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. RAFGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and RAFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. RAFGX (94.5B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than RAFGX: CGFAX (0.23) vs RAFGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than RAFGX: CGFAX (25 years) vs RAFGX (17 years). CGFAX (0.62) is less costly to investors than RAFGX (0.33). RAFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX (250) and RAFGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.03 vs. RAFGX (-3.69). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.11 vs. RAFGX (3.79).
| CGFAX | RAFGX | CGFAX / RAFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.33 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.33 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.063 | -1.940 | -467% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 94.5B | 374% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.03 | -3.69 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.54 | 28.01 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.11 | 3.79 | 346% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.83 | 76.93 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement