Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs RBCGX
CGFAX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs RBCGX
CGFAX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. RBCGX commentary
Jul 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and RBCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. RBCGX (67.8M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than RBCGX: CGFAX (0.23) vs RBCGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs RBCGX (38 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 411.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: CGFAX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.54 vs. RBCGX (-9.90). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.02 vs. RBCGX (-13.30).
| CGFAX | RBCGX | CGFAX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.01 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.01 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.349 | 1.840 | 291% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 67.8M | 526,549% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.54 | -9.90 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.02 | 32.82 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.02 | -13.30 | -105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.12 | 27.75 | 372% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers