Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs RBCGX
CGFAX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs RBCGX
CGFAX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. RBCGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and RBCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. RBCGX (69.8M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than RBCGX: CGFAX (0.23) vs RBCGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs RBCGX (38 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 411.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: CGFAX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. RBCGX (-1.00). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.99 vs. RBCGX (-8.79).
| CGFAX | RBCGX | CGFAX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.01 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.01 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.708 | 4.403 | 198% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 69.8M | 517,192% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | -1.00 | -1,196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.15 | 41.62 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.99 | -8.79 | -216% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.58 | 37.63 | 326% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement