Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs RGEBX
CGFAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs RGEBX
CGFAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX (357B) and RGEBX (357B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CGFAX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: CGFAX (0.23) vs RGEBX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: CGFAX (24 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX (32.00) and RGEBX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. CGFAX (250) and RGEBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.57 vs. CGFAX (-1.54). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.78 vs. RGEBX (8.51).
| CGFAX | RGEBX | CGFAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.08 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.08 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.408 | 4.096 | 59% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 357B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.54 | -0.57 | 268% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.18 | 30.75 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.78 | 8.51 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.12 | 87.35 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement