Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs RWGFX
CGFAX vs RWGFX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs RWGFX
CGFAX vs RWGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. RWGFX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and RWGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. RWGFX (27.2M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than RWGFX: CGFAX (0.23) vs RWGFX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than RWGFX: CGFAX (24 years) vs RWGFX (16 years). RWGFX (1.29) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RWGFX (23.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWGFX: CGFAX (250) vs RWGFX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.51 vs. RWGFX (-4.33). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.28 vs. RWGFX (-18.00).
| CGFAX | RWGFX | CGFAX / RWGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.25 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.29 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.972 | 4.739 | 147% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 27.2M | 1,312,500% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.51 | -4.33 | -81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.05 | 9.68 | 393% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.28 | -18.00 | -96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.87 | -73.60 | -144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement