Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs TGWFX
CGFAX vs TGWFX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs TGWFX
CGFAX vs TGWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. TGWFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and TGWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. TGWFX (352M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than TGWFX: CGFAX (0.23) vs TGWFX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than TGWFX: CGFAX (24 years) vs TGWFX (26 years). TGWFX (0.97) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). TGWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGWFX: CGFAX (250) vs TGWFX (5000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.20 vs. TGWFX (-18.94). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.81 vs. TGWFX (-38.98).
| CGFAX | TGWFX | CGFAX / TGWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.90 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.97 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.149 | 2.705 | 264% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 352M | 101,420% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.20 | -18.94 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.95 | 8.08 | 482% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.81 | -38.98 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.94 | 29.64 | 361% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement