Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs TILGX
CGFAX vs TILGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs TILGX
CGFAX vs TILGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. TILGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and TILGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. TILGX (6.19B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than TILGX: CGFAX (0.23) vs TILGX (0.04). CGFAX was incepted earlier than TILGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs TILGX (20 years). CGFAX (0.62) is less costly to investors than TILGX (0.40). TILGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TILGX: CGFAX (250) vs TILGX (1000000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. TILGX (6.46). TILGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.01 vs. CGFAX (18.99).
| CGFAX | TILGX | CGFAX / TILGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.40 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.40 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.708 | 4.809 | 181% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 6.19B | 5,829% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.04 | 562% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | 6.46 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.15 | 46.68 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.99 | 20.01 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.58 | 109.02 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement