Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs TRIHX
CGFAX vs TRIHX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs TRIHX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$84.26
Change-$0.59 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
Nuveen Large Cap Gr Idx I
Price$76.99
Change-$0.98 (-1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.03B
CGFAX vs TRIHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. TRIHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and TRIHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. TRIHX (18B). TRIHX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: TRIHX (0.40) vs CGFAX (0.30). CGFAX was incepted earlier than TRIHX: CGFAX (24 years) vs TRIHX (10 years). CGFAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than TRIHX (0.16). TRIHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIHX: CGFAX (250) vs TRIHX (100000). TRIHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.45 vs. CGFAX (7.06). TRIHX return over 5 years is better than : 69.55 vs. CGFAX (33.37).
| CGFAX | TRIHX | CGFAX / TRIHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.16 | 406% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.16 | 406% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.172 | 16.652 | 91% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 18B | 1,833% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.40 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.06 | 17.45 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.11 | 83.78 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.37 | 69.55 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement