Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs TRIHX
CGFAX vs TRIHX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs TRIHX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$82.26
Change-$0.15 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.74B
Nuveen Large Cap Gr Idx I
Price$73.82
Change-$0.09 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.27B
CGFAX vs TRIHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. TRIHX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and TRIHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. TRIHX (17.3B). TRIHX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: TRIHX (0.44) vs CGFAX (0.32). CGFAX was incepted earlier than TRIHX: CGFAX (23 years) vs TRIHX (10 years). CGFAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than TRIHX (0.16). TRIHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIHX: CGFAX (250) vs TRIHX (100000). TRIHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.35 vs. CGFAX (21.55). TRIHX return over 5 years is better than : 72.90 vs. CGFAX (42.84).
| CGFAX | TRIHX | CGFAX / TRIHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.16 | 406% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.16 | 406% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.438 | 10.578 | 118% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 17.3B | 1,879% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.44 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.55 | 30.35 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.48 | 58.85 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.84 | 72.90 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement