Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs TRIHX
CGFAX vs TRIHX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs TRIHX
CGFAX vs TRIHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. TRIHX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a StrongBuy and TRIHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. TRIHX (18.7B). TRIHX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: TRIHX (0.43) vs CGFAX (0.24). CGFAX was incepted earlier than TRIHX: CGFAX (25 years) vs TRIHX (11 years). CGFAX (0.62) is less costly to investors than TRIHX (0.12). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TRIHX (27.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIHX: CGFAX (250) vs TRIHX (100000). TRIHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.05 vs. CGFAX (5.42). TRIHX return over 5 years is better than : 39.06 vs. CGFAX (17.11).
| CGFAX | TRIHX | CGFAX / TRIHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.12 | 517% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.12 | 517% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.418 | 3.863 | 244% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 18.7B | 1,829% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.43 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 8.05 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.86 | 70.16 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.11 | 39.06 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.74 | 258.63 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement