Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs TRIHX
CGFAX vs TRIHX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs TRIHX
CGFAX vs TRIHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. TRIHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and TRIHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. TRIHX (18.7B). TRIHX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: TRIHX (0.40) vs CGFAX (0.23). CGFAX was incepted earlier than TRIHX: CGFAX (24 years) vs TRIHX (11 years). CGFAX (0.62) is less costly to investors than TRIHX (0.12). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TRIHX (27.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIHX: CGFAX (250) vs TRIHX (100000). TRIHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.99 vs. CGFAX (11.97). TRIHX return over 5 years is better than : 48.02 vs. CGFAX (18.99).
| CGFAX | TRIHX | CGFAX / TRIHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.12 | 517% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.12 | 517% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.708 | 4.417 | 197% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 18.7B | 1,930% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.40 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | 17.99 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.15 | 72.39 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.99 | 48.02 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.58 | 291.18 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement