Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs TRIHX
CGFAX vs TRIHX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs TRIHX
CGFAX vs TRIHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. TRIHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and TRIHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. TRIHX (19B). TRIHX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: TRIHX (0.41) vs CGFAX (0.23). CGFAX was incepted earlier than TRIHX: CGFAX (24 years) vs TRIHX (11 years). CGFAX (0.62) is less costly to investors than TRIHX (0.12). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TRIHX (27.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIHX: CGFAX (250) vs TRIHX (100000). TRIHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.21 vs. CGFAX (4.20). TRIHX return over 5 years is better than : 43.14 vs. CGFAX (15.81).
| CGFAX | TRIHX | CGFAX / TRIHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.12 | 517% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.12 | 517% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.149 | 5.195 | 138% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 19B | 1,879% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.41 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.20 | 12.21 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.95 | 66.50 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.81 | 43.14 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.94 | 270.69 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement