Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs TRIRX
CGFAX vs TRIRX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs TRIRX
CGFAX vs TRIRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. TRIRX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and TRIRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. TRIRX (18.4B). TRIRX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: TRIRX (0.27) vs CGFAX (0.23). CGFAX was incepted earlier than TRIRX: CGFAX (25 years) vs TRIRX (24 years). CGFAX (0.62) is less costly to investors than TRIRX (0.29). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TRIRX (27.00). TRIRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: TRIRX (0) vs CGFAX (250). TRIRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.24 vs. CGFAX (-0.03). TRIRX return over 5 years is better than : 34.83 vs. CGFAX (13.11).
| CGFAX | TRIRX | CGFAX / TRIRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.29 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.29 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.063 | 2.803 | 323% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 18.4B | 1,918% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.27 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.03 | 2.24 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.54 | 63.87 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.11 | 34.83 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.83 | 264.89 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers