Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs TRIRX
CGFAX vs TRIRX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs TRIRX
CGFAX vs TRIRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. TRIRX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and TRIRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. TRIRX (18B). TRIRX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: TRIRX (0.26) vs CGFAX (0.23). CGFAX was incepted earlier than TRIRX: CGFAX (24 years) vs TRIRX (24 years). CGFAX (0.62) is less costly to investors than TRIRX (0.29). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TRIRX (27.00). TRIRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: TRIRX (0) vs CGFAX (250). TRIRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.97 vs. CGFAX (-0.64). TRIRX return over 5 years is better than : 32.67 vs. CGFAX (10.57).
| CGFAX | TRIRX | CGFAX / TRIRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.29 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.29 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.777 | -0.235 | -1,610% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 18B | 1,983% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.26 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.64 | 3.97 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.16 | 56.97 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.57 | 32.67 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.23 | 247.71 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers