Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs TRIRX
CGFAX vs TRIRX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs TRIRX
CGFAX vs TRIRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. TRIRX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and TRIRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. TRIRX (18.7B). TRIRX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: TRIRX (0.26) vs CGFAX (0.23). CGFAX was incepted earlier than TRIRX: CGFAX (24 years) vs TRIRX (24 years). CGFAX (0.62) is less costly to investors than TRIRX (0.29). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TRIRX (27.00). TRIRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: TRIRX (0) vs CGFAX (250). TRIRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.28 vs. CGFAX (8.39). TRIRX return over 5 years is better than : 48.79 vs. CGFAX (18.12).
| CGFAX | TRIRX | CGFAX / TRIRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.29 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.29 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.591 | 2.855 | 231% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 18.7B | 1,930% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.26 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.39 | 14.28 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.35 | 69.24 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.12 | 48.79 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.45 | 275.34 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers