Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs URLGX
CGFAX vs URLGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs URLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$86.28
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth R
Price$3.62
Change+$0.02 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets654.64M
CGFAX vs URLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. URLGX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and URLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. URLGX (655M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than URLGX: CGFAX (0.31) vs URLGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than URLGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs URLGX (21 years). URLGX (1.41) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). URLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). URLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: URLGX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. URLGX (-33.94). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.47 vs. URLGX (-72.24).
| CGFAX | URLGX | CGFAX / URLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.30 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.41 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.933 | -25.820 | -69% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 655M | 51,450% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | -33.94 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.49 | -20.44 | -355% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.47 | -72.24 | -56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.22 | -77.59 | -137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement