Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs URLGX
CGFAX vs URLGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs URLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$83.60
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth R
Price$3.57
Change-$0.01 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets686.01M
CGFAX vs URLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. URLGX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and URLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. URLGX (686M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than URLGX: CGFAX (0.32) vs URLGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than URLGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs URLGX (21 years). URLGX (1.44) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). URLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). URLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: URLGX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. URLGX (-31.02). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.65 vs. URLGX (-69.84).
| CGFAX | URLGX | CGFAX / URLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.30 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.44 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.270 | -26.639 | -54% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 686M | 47,959% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | -31.02 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.81 | -35.14 | -122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.65 | -69.84 | -64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.49 | -79.61 | -116% |