Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs URLGX
CGFAX vs URLGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs URLGX
CGFAX vs URLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. URLGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and URLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. URLGX (528M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than URLGX: CGFAX (0.23) vs URLGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than URLGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs URLGX (21 years). URLGX (1.41) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). URLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). URLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: URLGX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. URLGX (-10.85). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.99 vs. URLGX (-70.40).
| CGFAX | URLGX | CGFAX / URLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.30 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.41 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.708 | 8.571 | 102% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 528M | 68,371% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | -10.85 | -110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.15 | -45.13 | -107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.99 | -70.40 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.58 | -78.38 | -156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement