Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs VRLCX
CGFAX vs VRLCX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs VRLCX
CGFAX vs VRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. VRLCX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and VRLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. VRLCX (3.71B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than VRLCX: CGFAX (0.23) vs VRLCX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than VRLCX: CGFAX (24 years) vs VRLCX (11 years). VRLCX (0.68) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). VRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). VRLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: VRLCX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX (11.97) and VRLCX (11.41) have marching annual gain over last year. CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.99 vs. VRLCX (-17.96).
| CGFAX | VRLCX | CGFAX / VRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.67 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.68 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.708 | 8.347 | 104% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 3.71B | 9,720% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | 11.41 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.15 | 67.98 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.99 | -17.96 | -106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.58 | 14.09 | 870% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement