Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs VRLCX
CGFAX vs VRLCX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs VRLCX
CGFAX vs VRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. VRLCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a StrongBuy and VRLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. VRLCX (3.52B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than VRLCX: CGFAX (0.24) vs VRLCX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than VRLCX: CGFAX (25 years) vs VRLCX (11 years). VRLCX (0.68) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). VRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). VRLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: VRLCX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.42 vs. VRLCX (2.74). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.11 vs. VRLCX (-17.45).
| CGFAX | VRLCX | CGFAX / VRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.67 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.68 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.418 | -4.754 | -198% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 3.52B | 9,708% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 2.74 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.86 | 46.82 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.11 | -17.45 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.74 | 5.74 | 1,841% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement