Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WLGYX
CGFAX vs WLGYX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WLGYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$84.69
Change+$0.20 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund Y
Price$40.33
Change-$0.21 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.01B
CGFAX vs WLGYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WLGYX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and WLGYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. WLGYX (8.01B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WLGYX: CGFAX (0.32) vs WLGYX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WLGYX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WLGYX (25 years). WLGYX (0.99) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGYX (18.00). WLGYX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: WLGYX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.35 vs. WLGYX (12.03). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.66 vs. WLGYX (34.93).
| CGFAX | WLGYX | CGFAX / WLGYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.99 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.760 | 6.243 | 252% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 8.01B | 4,145% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.35 | 12.03 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.35 | 48.16 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.66 | 34.93 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.34 | 110.38 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers