Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WOFRX
CGFAX vs WOFRX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WOFRX
CGFAX vs WOFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WOFRX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and WOFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. WOFRX (1.85B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WOFRX: CGFAX (0.23) vs WOFRX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WOFRX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WOFRX (6 years). WOFRX (0.77) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WOFRX (21.00). WOFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: WOFRX (0) vs CGFAX (250). WOFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.50 vs. CGFAX (-0.64). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.57 vs. WOFRX (-2.20).
| CGFAX | WOFRX | CGFAX / WOFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.69 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.77 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.777 | 6.616 | 57% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 1.85B | 19,350% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.64 | 1.50 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.16 | 16.56 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.57 | -2.20 | -480% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers