Ad is loading...
CGFAX vs WPASX
CGFAX vs WPASX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPASX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$64.96
Change-$2.67 (-3.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.59B
AB Concentrated Growth A
Price$46.76
Change-$1.38 (-2.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets684.05M
CGFAX vs WPASX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPASX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and WPASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 272B vs. WPASX (684M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPASX: CGFAX (0.39) vs WPASX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPASX: CGFAX (23 years) vs WPASX (11 years). WPASX (1.00) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPASX (11.00). WPASX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPASX: CGFAX (250) vs WPASX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.14 vs. WPASX (-10.77). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.27 vs. WPASX (27.97).
| CGFAX | WPASX | CGFAX / WPASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.00 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.00 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.559 | -6.105 | 124% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 82% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 272B | 684M | 39,766% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.14 | -10.77 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.22 | -3.95 | -234% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.27 | 27.97 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.49 | 69.45 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...