Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPASX
CGFAX vs WPASX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPASX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$83.60
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
AB Concentrated Growth A
Price$54.88
Change-$0.13 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets737.09M
CGFAX vs WPASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPASX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and WPASX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. WPASX (737M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPASX: CGFAX (0.32) vs WPASX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPASX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WPASX (11 years). WPASX (1.00) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPASX (11.00). WPASX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPASX: CGFAX (250) vs WPASX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. WPASX (-1.24). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.65 vs. WPASX (21.90).
| CGFAX | WPASX | CGFAX / WPASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.00 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.00 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.270 | 7.295 | 196% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 82% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 737M | 44,640% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | -1.24 | -1,176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.81 | 11.45 | 374% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.65 | 21.90 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.49 | 86.99 | 106% |