Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPASX
CGFAX vs WPASX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPASX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$82.88
Change+$0.27 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.05B
AB Concentrated Growth A
Price$55.80
Change+$0.29 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets752.28M
CGFAX vs WPASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPASX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a StrongBuy and WPASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. WPASX (752M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPASX: CGFAX (0.33) vs WPASX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPASX: CGFAX (23 years) vs WPASX (11 years). WPASX (1.00) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPASX (11.00). WPASX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPASX: CGFAX (250) vs WPASX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.64 vs. WPASX (2.38). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.25 vs. WPASX (28.11).
| CGFAX | WPASX | CGFAX / WPASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.00 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.00 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.286 | 8.270 | 161% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 82% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 752M | 43,484% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.64 | 2.38 | 741% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.64 | 25.17 | 233% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.25 | 28.11 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.72 | 90.96 | 101% |