Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPASX
CGFAX vs WPASX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPASX
CGFAX vs WPASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPASX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a StrongBuy and WPASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. WPASX (451M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPASX: CGFAX (0.24) vs WPASX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPASX: CGFAX (25 years) vs WPASX (12 years). WPASX (1.00) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPASX (18.00). WPASX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPASX: CGFAX (250) vs WPASX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.42 vs. WPASX (-10.40). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.11 vs. WPASX (-19.73).
| CGFAX | WPASX | CGFAX / WPASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.00 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.00 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.418 | -2.062 | -457% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 82% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342B | 451M | 75,831% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | -10.40 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.86 | 2.42 | 1,933% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.11 | -19.73 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.74 | 73.44 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement