Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPASX
CGFAX vs WPASX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPASX
CGFAX vs WPASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPASX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and WPASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. WPASX (466M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPASX: CGFAX (0.23) vs WPASX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPASX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WPASX (12 years). WPASX (1.00) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPASX (18.00). WPASX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPASX: CGFAX (250) vs WPASX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.20 vs. WPASX (-11.10). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.81 vs. WPASX (-19.76).
| CGFAX | WPASX | CGFAX / WPASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.00 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.00 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.149 | -4.245 | -168% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 82% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 466M | 76,609% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.20 | -11.10 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.95 | -1.49 | -2,621% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.81 | -19.76 | -80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.94 | 76.06 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement