Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPASX
CGFAX vs WPASX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPASX
CGFAX vs WPASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPASX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and WPASX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. WPASX (473M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPASX: CGFAX (0.23) vs WPASX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPASX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WPASX (12 years). WPASX (1.00) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPASX (18.00). WPASX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPASX: CGFAX (250) vs WPASX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. WPASX (-9.63). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.99 vs. WPASX (-17.07).
| CGFAX | WPASX | CGFAX / WPASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.00 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.00 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.708 | -5.447 | -160% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 82% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 473M | 76,321% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | -9.63 | -124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.15 | 1.36 | 3,528% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.99 | -17.07 | -111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.58 | 85.66 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement