Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPASX
CGFAX vs WPASX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPASX
CGFAX vs WPASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPASX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and WPASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. WPASX (422M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPASX: CGFAX (0.23) vs WPASX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPASX: CGFAX (25 years) vs WPASX (13 years). WPASX (1.00) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPASX (18.00). WPASX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPASX: CGFAX (250) vs WPASX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.03 vs. WPASX (-15.44). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.11 vs. WPASX (-23.32).
| CGFAX | WPASX | CGFAX / WPASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.00 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.00 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.063 | -6.268 | -145% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 82% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 422M | 83,649% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.03 | -15.44 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.54 | -3.84 | -1,107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.11 | -23.32 | -56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.83 | 70.15 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement