Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPCSX
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$84.71
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$47.13
Change-$0.59 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets692.65M
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPCSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and WPCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. WPCSX (693M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: CGFAX (0.30) vs WPCSX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (18.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: CGFAX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.84 vs. WPCSX (-9.74). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.52 vs. WPCSX (1.02).
| CGFAX | WPCSX | CGFAX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.787 | 3.829 | 412% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 693M | 47,186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.84 | -9.74 | -70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.98 | 14.96 | 421% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.52 | 1.02 | 3,398% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.75 | 69.34 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement