Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPCSX
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$87.61
Change+$0.48 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$50.11
Change+$0.24 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets736.26M
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPCSX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. WPCSX (736M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: CGFAX (0.31) vs WPCSX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: CGFAX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.76 vs. WPCSX (-4.56). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.10 vs. WPCSX (12.88).
| CGFAX | WPCSX | CGFAX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.751 | 8.507 | 232% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 736M | 46,332% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.76 | -4.56 | -324% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.13 | 31.41 | 242% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.10 | 12.88 | 350% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.76 | 80.17 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement