Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPCSX
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$86.76
Change+$0.61 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$49.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets729.93M
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPCSX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. WPCSX (730M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: CGFAX (0.32) vs WPCSX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: CGFAX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.79 vs. WPCSX (-6.65). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.54 vs. WPCSX (12.90).
| CGFAX | WPCSX | CGFAX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.756 | 6.614 | 268% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 730M | 46,301% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.79 | -6.65 | -268% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.35 | 20.45 | 295% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.54 | 12.90 | 384% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.87 | 78.51 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement