Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPCSX
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPCSX
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPCSX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. WPCSX (466M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: CGFAX (0.23) vs WPCSX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPCSX (18.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: CGFAX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.35 vs. WPCSX (-13.84). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.48 vs. WPCSX (-25.46).
| CGFAX | WPCSX | CGFAX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.75 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.75 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.542 | -5.098 | -148% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 466M | 77,468% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.35 | -13.84 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.61 | -4.60 | -948% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.48 | -25.46 | -61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.12 | 57.95 | 190% |