Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPCSX
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPCSX
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPCSX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. WPCSX (476M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: CGFAX (0.23) vs WPCSX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPCSX (18.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: CGFAX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.68 vs. WPCSX (-12.39). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 21.73 vs. WPCSX (-22.70).
| CGFAX | WPCSX | CGFAX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.75 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.75 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.482 | -6.463 | -147% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 476M | 75,840% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.68 | -12.39 | -102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.34 | -4.73 | -1,001% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.73 | -22.70 | -96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.04 | 61.05 | 197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement