Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPSGX
CGFAX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPSGX
CGFAX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPSGX commentary
Jul 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and WPSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. WPSGX (453M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPSGX: CGFAX (0.23) vs WPSGX (0.04). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WPSGX (32 years). WPSGX (0.75) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPSGX (18.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: WPSGX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.54 vs. WPSGX (-12.35). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.02 vs. WPSGX (-18.68).
| CGFAX | WPSGX | CGFAX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.75 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.75 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.349 | -5.296 | -101% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 453M | 78,808% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.04 | 666% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.54 | -12.35 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.02 | -2.64 | -1,403% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.02 | -18.68 | -75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.12 | 77.69 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers