Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPSZX
CGFAX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPSZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$83.77
Change-$0.79 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
AB Concentrated Growth Z
Price$56.93
Change-$0.21 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets731.47M
CGFAX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPSZX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and WPSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. WPSZX (731M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPSZX: CGFAX (0.32) vs WPSZX (0.15). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WPSZX (12 years). WPSZX (0.72) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSZX (11.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: CGFAX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.38 vs. WPSZX (-2.10). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.02 vs. WPSZX (19.31).
| CGFAX | WPSZX | CGFAX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.72 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.72 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.502 | 7.334 | 198% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 731M | 44,870% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.15 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.38 | -2.10 | -684% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.21 | 23.15 | 239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.02 | 19.31 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.00 | 112.11 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement