Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPSZX
CGFAX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPSZX
CGFAX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPSZX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and WPSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. WPSZX (422M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPSZX: CGFAX (0.23) vs WPSZX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: CGFAX (25 years) vs WPSZX (13 years). WPSZX (0.74) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPSZX (18.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: CGFAX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.03 vs. WPSZX (-14.93). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.11 vs. WPSZX (-21.51).
| CGFAX | WPSZX | CGFAX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.73 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.74 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.063 | -6.066 | -149% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 422M | 83,649% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.03 | -14.93 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.54 | -2.41 | -1,764% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.11 | -21.51 | -61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.83 | 77.08 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement