Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFCX vs MPAIX
CGFCX vs MPAIX Comparison
Open Charts CGFCX vs MPAIX
CGFCX vs MPAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFCX vs. MPAIX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFCX is a Buy and MPAIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFCX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MPAIX (276M). MPAIX pays higher dividends than CGFCX: MPAIX (0.03) vs CGFCX (0.00). CGFCX was incepted earlier than MPAIX: CGFCX (24 years) vs MPAIX (18 years). CGFCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than MPAIX (1.02). MPAIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CGFCX (32.00). CGFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MPAIX: CGFCX (250) vs MPAIX (1000000). CGFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.68 vs. MPAIX (-2.30). CGFCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.14 vs. MPAIX (-39.49).
| CGFCX | MPAIX | CGFCX / MPAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.85 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.02 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.708 | -1.875 | -358% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 276M | 129,348% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.03 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.68 | -2.30 | -73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.94 | 64.38 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.14 | -39.49 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.50 | 60.26 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers