Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFCX vs MSEGX
CGFCX vs MSEGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFCX vs MSEGX
CGFCX vs MSEGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFCX vs. MSEGX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFCX is a Hold and MSEGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFCX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MSEGX (3.32B). CGFCX (0.00) and MSEGX (0.00) have matching dividends . CGFCX was incepted earlier than MSEGX: CGFCX (24 years) vs MSEGX (30 years). CGFCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than MSEGX (0.89). MSEGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. CGFCX (32.00). CGFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSEGX: CGFCX (250) vs MSEGX (1000). CGFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.40 vs. MSEGX (-3.78). CGFCX return over 5 years is better than : 7.97 vs. MSEGX (-37.68).
| CGFCX | MSEGX | CGFCX / MSEGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.89 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.89 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.936 | -11.348 | -52% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 3.32B | 10,890% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.40 | -3.78 | -143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.87 | 84.73 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.97 | -37.68 | -21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.17 | 47.02 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement