Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFCX vs MSEGX
CGFCX vs MSEGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFCX vs MSEGX
CGFCX vs MSEGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFCX vs. MSEGX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFCX is a Hold and MSEGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFCX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MSEGX (3.35B). CGFCX (0.00) and MSEGX (0.00) have matching dividends . CGFCX was incepted earlier than MSEGX: CGFCX (24 years) vs MSEGX (31 years). CGFCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than MSEGX (0.89). MSEGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. CGFCX (32.00). CGFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSEGX: CGFCX (250) vs MSEGX (1000). CGFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.21 vs. MSEGX (-4.18). CGFCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.20 vs. MSEGX (-42.06).
| CGFCX | MSEGX | CGFCX / MSEGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.89 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.89 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.215 | -7.886 | -53% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 3.35B | 10,660% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.21 | -4.18 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.14 | 81.90 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.20 | -42.06 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.85 | 55.73 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement