Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFCX vs MSHLX
CGFCX vs MSHLX Comparison
Open Charts CGFCX vs MSHLX
CGFCX vs MSHLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFCX vs. MSHLX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFCX is a Buy and MSHLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFCX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. MSHLX (3.56B). CGFCX (0.00) and MSHLX (0.00) have matching dividends . CGFCX was incepted earlier than MSHLX: CGFCX (24 years) vs MSHLX (14 years). MSHLX (1.40) and CGFCX (1.39) have similar cost to investors . MSHLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. CGFCX (32.00). CGFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHLX: CGFCX (250) vs MSHLX (1000). MSHLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.17 vs. CGFCX (1.68). CGFCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.14 vs. MSHLX (-39.03).
| CGFCX | MSHLX | CGFCX / MSHLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.40 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.40 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.708 | -3.053 | -220% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 3.56B | 10,037% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.68 | 4.17 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.94 | 87.70 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.14 | -39.03 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.50 | 46.99 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement