Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFCX vs MSHLX
CGFCX vs MSHLX Comparison
Open Charts CGFCX vs MSHLX
CGFCX vs MSHLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFCX vs. MSHLX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFCX is a Buy and MSHLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFCX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MSHLX (3.44B). CGFCX (0.00) and MSHLX (0.00) have matching dividends . CGFCX was incepted earlier than MSHLX: CGFCX (25 years) vs MSHLX (14 years). MSHLX (1.40) and CGFCX (1.39) have similar cost to investors . MSHLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. CGFCX (32.00). CGFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHLX: CGFCX (250) vs MSHLX (1000). CGFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.43 vs. MSHLX (-8.04). CGFCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.67 vs. MSHLX (-41.96).
| CGFCX | MSHLX | CGFCX / MSHLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.40 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.40 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.489 | -3.016 | -281% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 3.44B | 10,259% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.43 | -8.04 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.35 | 97.23 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.67 | -41.96 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.84 | 43.04 | 190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement