Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFCX vs RGABX
CGFCX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts CGFCX vs RGABX
CGFCX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFCX vs. RGABX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFCX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFCX (361B) and RGABX (361B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CGFCX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . CGFCX was incepted earlier than RGABX: CGFCX (24 years) vs RGABX (24 years). CGFCX (1.39) and RGABX (1.38) have similar cost to investors . CGFCX (32.00) and RGABX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. CGFCX (250) and RGABX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.00 vs. CGFCX (3.46). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 9.24 vs. CGFCX (7.49).
| CGFCX | RGABX | CGFCX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.38 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.38 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.578 | 8.589 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 361B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.46 | 4.00 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.12 | 39.71 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.49 | 9.24 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.70 | 89.57 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement