Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFCX vs RGAHX
CGFCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts CGFCX vs RGAHX
CGFCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFCX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFCX (357B) and RGAHX (357B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RGAHX pays higher dividends than CGFCX: RGAHX (0.40) vs CGFCX (0.00). CGFCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: CGFCX (24 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). CGFCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). CGFCX (32.00) and RGAHX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. CGFCX (250) and RGAHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.43 vs. CGFCX (1.68). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 16.49 vs. CGFCX (6.14).
| CGFCX | RGAHX | CGFCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.44 | 316% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.44 | 316% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.708 | 7.244 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 357B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.68 | 4.43 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.94 | 39.88 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.14 | 16.49 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.50 | 102.84 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement