Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFCX vs RGEBX
CGFCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts CGFCX vs RGEBX
CGFCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFCX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFCX (357B) and RGEBX (357B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CGFCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . CGFCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: CGFCX (24 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). CGFCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). CGFCX (32.00) and RGEBX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. CGFCX (250) and RGEBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.42 vs. CGFCX (1.68). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 12.32 vs. CGFCX (6.14).
| CGFCX | RGEBX | CGFCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.08 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.08 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.708 | 6.888 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 357B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.68 | 3.42 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.94 | 36.26 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.14 | 12.32 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.50 | 93.96 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement