Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFEX vs RGACX
CGFEX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CGFEX vs RGACX
CGFEX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFEX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFEX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFEX (353B) and RGACX (353B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CGFEX pays higher dividends than RGACX: CGFEX (0.01) vs RGACX (0.00). CGFEX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CGFEX (25 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CGFEX (0.87). CGFEX (32.00) and RGACX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. CGFEX (250) and RGACX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CGFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.49 vs. RGACX (-0.53). CGFEX (11.03) and RGACX (10.82) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CGFEX | RGACX | CGFEX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.93 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.93 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.862 | 8.819 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 353B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.49 | -0.53 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.86 | 40.68 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.03 | 10.82 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.87 | 101.31 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers