Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFFX vs RGAGX
CGFFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFFX vs RGAGX
CGFFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFFX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFFX (361B) and RGAGX (361B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RGAGX pays higher dividends than CGFFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs CGFFX (0.38). CGFFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: CGFFX (24 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). CGFFX (0.70) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). CGFFX (32.00) and RGAGX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. CGFFX (250) and RGAGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.50 vs. CGFFX (4.97). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.64 vs. CGFFX (15.36).
| CGFFX | RGAGX | CGFFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.29 | 241% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.29 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.837 | 8.055 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 361B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.51 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.97 | 6.50 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.34 | 45.31 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.36 | 17.64 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.10 | 114.06 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement