Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGGO vs FWD
CGGO vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts CGGO vs FWD
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Price$32.17
Change+$0.30 (+0.94%)
Volume$2.96K
Net Assets6.18B
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$89.03
Change+$0.37 (+0.42%)
Volume$300
Net Assets749.29M
CGGO vs FWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGGO vs. FWD commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGGO is a Buy and FWD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGGO has more net assets: 6.18B vs. FWD (749M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than CGGO: FWD (11.959) vs CGGO (9.069). CGGO was incepted earlier than FWD: CGGO (3 years) vs FWD (2 years). CGGO (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover CGGO (31.00) vs CGGO (31.00).
| CGGO | FWD | CGGO / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 9.069 | 11.959 | 76% |
| Net Assets | 6.18B | 749M | 825% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.65 | 72% |
| Turnover | 31.00 | 163.00 | 19% |
| Yield | 1.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGGO | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 29 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGGO has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGGO jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGO | 100% | +0.92% | ||
| BN - CGGO | 82% Closely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| ASML - CGGO | 81% Closely correlated | -2.10% | ||
| TSM - CGGO | 75% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| IR - CGGO | 73% Closely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| SNPS - CGGO | 73% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +1.64% | ||
| APH - FWD | 82% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | +3.20% | ||
| KLAC - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| ARM - FWD | 77% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||