Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGGO vs FWD
CGGO vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts CGGO vs FWD
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Price$34.52
Change-$0.29 (-0.83%)
Volume$5.15K
Net Assets7.62B
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$105.52
Change-$0.34 (-0.32%)
Volume$200
Net Assets1.18B
CGGO vs FWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGGO vs. FWD commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGGO is a StrongBuy and FWD is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGGO has more net assets: 7.62B vs. FWD (1.18B). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than CGGO: FWD (33.674) vs CGGO (19.369). CGGO was incepted earlier than FWD: CGGO (4 years) vs FWD (3 years). CGGO (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover CGGO (26.00) vs CGGO (26.00).
| CGGO | FWD | CGGO / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 19.369 | 33.674 | 58% |
| Net Assets | 7.62B | 1.18B | 648% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.65 | 72% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 163.00 | 16% |
| Yield | 1.26 | 0.01 | 22,655% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGGO | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 76% | 15 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGGO has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGGO jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGO | 100% | -0.75% | ||
| BN - CGGO | 79% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| TSM - CGGO | 74% Closely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| BX - CGGO | 73% Closely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| NVDA - CGGO | 72% Closely correlated | +1.83% | ||
| TEL - CGGO | 72% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +2.15% | ||
| ETN - FWD | 83% Closely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| NVDA - FWD | 80% Closely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| VRT - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | +5.36% | ||
| APH - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| COHR - FWD | 77% Closely correlated | +2.74% | ||
More | ||||