Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGGO vs FWD
CGGO vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts CGGO vs FWD
CGGO vs FWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGGO vs. FWD commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGGO is a Hold and FWD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGGO has more net assets: 11.6B vs. FWD (3.12B). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than CGGO: FWD (27.737) vs CGGO (15.325). CGGO was incepted earlier than FWD: CGGO (4 years) vs FWD (3 years). CGGO (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover CGGO (26.00) vs CGGO (26.00).
| CGGO | FWD | CGGO / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 15.325 | 27.737 | 55% |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 3.12B | 371% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.65 | 72% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 196.00 | 13% |
| Yield | 0.94 | 0.08 | 1,169% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGGO | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGGO has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGGO jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGO | 100% | -2.54% | ||
| TSM - CGGO | 75% Closely correlated | -2.89% | ||
| CAT - CGGO | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.20% | ||
| FIX - CGGO | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| SAN - CGGO | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| AMAT - CGGO | 63% Loosely correlated | -4.50% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | -3.47% | ||
| ONTO - FWD | 76% Closely correlated | -5.36% | ||
| MPWR - FWD | 75% Closely correlated | -4.54% | ||
| ETN - FWD | 75% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| VRT - FWD | 72% Closely correlated | -4.07% | ||
| TER - FWD | 71% Closely correlated | -5.14% | ||
More | ||||