Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGIAX vs VFWPX
CGIAX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts CGIAX vs VFWPX
CGIAX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGIAX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGIAX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 94.6B vs. CGIAX (20.7B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than CGIAX: VFWPX (2.54) vs CGIAX (1.78). CGIAX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: CGIAX (18 years) vs VFWPX (16 years). CGIAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). CGIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. VFWPX (6.00). CGIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: CGIAX (250) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.31 vs. CGIAX (18.17). CGIAX (35.92) and VFWPX (34.76) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CGIAX | VFWPX | CGIAX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.03 | 3,100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.03 | 3,100% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.944 | 9.981 | 120% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.7B | 94.6B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 2.54 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.17 | 21.31 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.14 | 46.76 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.92 | 34.76 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.39 | 95.03 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers