Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGIFX vs FSGEX
CGIFX vs FSGEX Comparison
Open Charts CGIFX vs FSGEX
CGIFX vs FSGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGIFX vs. FSGEX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGIFX is a Hold and FSGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. CGIFX (20.7B). FSGEX pays higher dividends than CGIFX: FSGEX (2.63) vs CGIFX (2.38). CGIFX was incepted earlier than FSGEX: CGIFX (18 years) vs FSGEX (17 years). CGIFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). CGIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGIFX: FSGEX (0) vs CGIFX (250). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.41 vs. CGIFX (16.67). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 52.10 vs. CGIFX (33.94).
| CGIFX | FSGEX | CGIFX / FSGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.01 | 9,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.01 | 9,800% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.782 | 13.279 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.7B | 74.9B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.38 | 2.63 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.67 | 26.41 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.59 | 66.42 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.94 | 52.10 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.81 | 140.84 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers