Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGIFX vs VTMNX
CGIFX vs VTMNX Comparison
Open Charts CGIFX vs VTMNX
CGIFX vs VTMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGIFX vs. VTMNX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGIFX is a StrongBuy and VTMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMNX has more cash in the bank: 317B vs. CGIFX (20.7B). VTMNX pays higher dividends than CGIFX: VTMNX (2.61) vs CGIFX (2.38). CGIFX was incepted earlier than VTMNX: CGIFX (18 years) vs VTMNX (25 years). CGIFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than VTMNX (0.03). CGIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. VTMNX (4.00). CGIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTMNX: CGIFX (250) vs VTMNX (5000000). VTMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.09 vs. CGIFX (22.43). VTMNX return over 5 years is better than : 38.60 vs. CGIFX (35.71).
| CGIFX | VTMNX | CGIFX / VTMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.03 | 3,267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.03 | 3,267% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.741 | 14.550 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.7B | 317B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.38 | 2.61 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.43 | 28.09 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.37 | 55.40 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.71 | 38.60 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.00 | 115.30 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement