Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGIFX vs VTMNX
CGIFX vs VTMNX Comparison
Open Charts CGIFX vs VTMNX
CGIFX vs VTMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGIFX vs. VTMNX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGIFX is a Hold and VTMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMNX has more cash in the bank: 317B vs. CGIFX (20.7B). VTMNX pays higher dividends than CGIFX: VTMNX (2.54) vs CGIFX (2.38). CGIFX was incepted earlier than VTMNX: CGIFX (18 years) vs VTMNX (26 years). CGIFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than VTMNX (0.03). CGIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. VTMNX (4.00). CGIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTMNX: CGIFX (250) vs VTMNX (5000000). VTMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.21 vs. CGIFX (16.67). VTMNX return over 5 years is better than : 39.77 vs. CGIFX (33.94).
| CGIFX | VTMNX | CGIFX / VTMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.03 | 3,267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.03 | 3,267% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.782 | 13.257 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.7B | 317B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.38 | 2.54 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.67 | 24.21 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.59 | 55.61 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.94 | 39.77 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.81 | 110.82 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers