CGMBF
Price
$0.33
Change
-$0.02 (-5.71%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
CIHKY
Price
$24.09
Change
+$0.11 (+0.46%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

CGMBF vs CIHKY

Header iconCGMBF vs CIHKY Comparison
Open Charts CGMBF vs CIHKYBanner chart's image
China Minsheng Banking
Price$0.33
Change-$0.02 (-5.71%)
Volume$19K
CapitalizationN/A
China Merchants Bank
Price$24.09
Change+$0.11 (+0.46%)
Volume$33.52K
CapitalizationN/A
CGMBF vs CIHKY Comparison Chart
Loading...
CIHKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGMBF vs. CIHKY commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGMBF is a Buy and CIHKY is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CGMBF: $0.33 vs. CIHKY: $24.09)
Brand notoriety: CGMBF and CIHKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGMBF: 100% vs. CIHKY: 80%
Market capitalization -- CGMBF: $23.21B vs. CIHKY: $125.76B
CGMBF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $23.21B. CIHKY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $125.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGMBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCIHKY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CGMBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CIHKY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIHKY is a better buy in the long-term than CGMBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIHKY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CIHKY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

CGMBF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CIHKY (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.55%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.30% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIHKY($126B) has a higher market cap than CGMBF($23.2B). CIHKY has higher P/E ratio than CGMBF: CIHKY (6.34) vs CGMBF (3.90). CIHKY YTD gains are higher at: 47.295 vs. CGMBF (6.452). CIHKY has higher revenues than CGMBF: CIHKY (341B) vs CGMBF (143B).
CGMBFCIHKYCGMBF / CIHKY
Capitalization23.2B126B18%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.45247.29514%
P/E Ratio3.906.3462%
Revenue143B341B42%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt668BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGMBF vs CIHKY: Fundamental Ratings
CGMBF
CIHKY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
446
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10078
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3828
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
16n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGMBF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CIHKY (32). This means that CGMBF’s stock grew similarly to CIHKY’s over the last 12 months.

CIHKY's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMBF (100). This means that CIHKY’s stock grew similarly to CGMBF’s over the last 12 months.

CIHKY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMBF (1). This means that CIHKY’s stock grew similarly to CGMBF’s over the last 12 months.

CIHKY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMBF (70). This means that CIHKY’s stock grew similarly to CGMBF’s over the last 12 months.

CIHKY's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMBF (38). This means that CIHKY’s stock grew similarly to CGMBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGMBFCIHKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CIHKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BABSX9.05N/A
N/A
BlackRock Global Equity Abs Rtn Instl
HGOFX69.33N/A
N/A
Hartford Growth Opportunities F
JEMGX9.60-0.20
-2.04%
JHancock Emerging Markets Equity R6
ENHCX10.22-0.25
-2.39%
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income C
FIJZX53.66-2.57
-4.57%
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Discret Z

CGMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMBF and KSBI have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMBF and KSBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGMBF
1D Price
Change %
CGMBF100%
N/A
KSBI - CGMBF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABBB - CGMBF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
CCBC - CGMBF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
CIBEY - CGMBF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIHKY - CGMBF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
More

CIHKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIHKY has been loosely correlated with HSNGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIHKY jumps, then HSNGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIHKY
1D Price
Change %
CIHKY100%
+0.46%
HSNGY - CIHKY
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
BHKLY - CIHKY
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
PSTVY - CIHKY
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
VBFC - CIHKY
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIHHF - CIHKY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More