CGMBF vs CIHKY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGMBF is a Hold and CIHKY is a StrongSell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CGMBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCIHKY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CGMBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CIHKY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CIHKY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CIHKY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CGMBF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CIHKY (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| CGMBF | CIHKY | CGMBF / CIHKY | |
| Capitalization | 23.2B | 126B | 18% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.452 | 43.320 | 15% |
| P/E Ratio | 3.90 | 6.34 | 62% |
| Revenue | 143B | 341B | 42% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 668B | N/A | - |
CGMBF | CIHKY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 3 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CGMBF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CIHKY (30). This means that CGMBF’s stock grew similarly to CIHKY’s over the last 12 months.
CIHKY's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMBF (100). This means that CIHKY’s stock grew similarly to CGMBF’s over the last 12 months.
CIHKY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMBF (1). This means that CIHKY’s stock grew similarly to CGMBF’s over the last 12 months.
CIHKY's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMBF (70). This means that CIHKY’s stock grew similarly to CGMBF’s over the last 12 months.
CIHKY's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMBF (49). This means that CIHKY’s stock grew similarly to CGMBF’s over the last 12 months.
| CIHKY | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DOG | 26.27 | 0.19 | +0.73% |
| ProShares Short Dow30 | |||
| GABF | 48.44 | 0.04 | +0.08% |
| Gabelli Financial Services Opp ETF | |||
| RPV | 93.96 | -0.07 | -0.07% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF | |||
| QYLE | 27.89 | -0.19 | -0.68% |
| Global X Nasdaq 100 ESG Covered Call ETF | |||
| ROUS | 52.47 | -0.56 | -1.06% |
| Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | |||
CGMBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMBF and KSBI have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMBF and KSBI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGMBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGMBF | 100% | N/A | ||
| KSBI - CGMBF | 33% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ABBB - CGMBF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CCBC - CGMBF | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.09% | ||
| CIBEY - CGMBF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
| CIHKY - CGMBF | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.76% | ||
More | ||||
CIHKY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIHKY has been loosely correlated with HSNGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIHKY jumps, then HSNGY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIHKY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIHKY | 100% | -1.76% | ||
| HSNGY - CIHKY | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| BHKLY - CIHKY | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| PSTVY - CIHKY | 33% Poorly correlated | -3.90% | ||
| VBFC - CIHKY | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
| CIHHF - CIHKY | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||