Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGMS vs SCIO
CGMS vs SCIO Comparison
Open Charts CGMS vs SCIO
CGMS vs SCIO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGMS vs. SCIO commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGMS is a Hold and SCIO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGMS has more net assets: 5.34B vs. SCIO (501M). SCIO has a higher annual dividend yield than CGMS: SCIO (1.725) vs CGMS (1.105). CGMS was incepted earlier than SCIO: CGMS (4 years) vs SCIO (2 years). CGMS (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than SCIO (0.70). SCIO has a higher turnover CGMS (40.00) vs CGMS (40.00).
| CGMS | SCIO | CGMS / SCIO | |
| Gain YTD | 1.105 | 1.725 | 64% |
| Net Assets | 5.34B | 501M | 1,066% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.70 | 56% |
| Turnover | 40.00 | 100.00 | 40% |
| Yield | 6.11 | 5.70 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGMS | SCIO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 11% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 24% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 30% | 4 days ago 9% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 32% | 4 days ago 7% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 25% | 4 days ago 9% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 60% | 7 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 33% | 12 days ago 17% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 45% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 18% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GENW | 15.52 | 0.26 | +1.70% |
| Genter Capital International Div ETF | |||
| IBTI | 22.07 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Treasury ETF | |||
| OVB | 20.02 | -0.03 | -0.14% |
| Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF | |||
| URSP | 49.83 | -0.15 | -0.29% |
| ProShares Ultra S&P 500 Equal Weight | |||
| CAF | 19.15 | -0.18 | -0.93% |
| Morgan Stanley China A Share Fund | |||
CGMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMS and DBD have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMS and DBD's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGMS | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| DBD - CGMS | 31% Poorly correlated | +3.27% | ||
| NFE - CGMS | 11% Poorly correlated | -2.63% |